NOTICE how the SAME LYING RIGHT-WING SHILLS keep coming back to "debunking" the truth movement, as if truth was something that should be debunked? You may have seen them buzzing the topic, day after day, week after week, like flies on shit. Which makes sense in a way too because so much bullshit is spread around in the forums. They just want to deny deny deny and when that gets old and they get trapped in a corner they can't answer they try other gambits to shift attention away from core issues. In the case of this blog's focal point on molten metal, try bringing it up as a topic somewhere (anywhere practically there's any active discussion of 9/11 truth) and you will see the shills quickly start hollering about how the steel must have gotten hot enough to soften and collapse the buildings, which is of course the OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORY. Well okay maybe that's a topic for discussion too and maybe it's even a possibility if you can show any mechanism whereby the steel could have softened enough to collapse the building, BUT THAT IS NOT THE FRIGGING TOPIC. THE TOPIC IS THE MOLTEN METAL IN THE BASEMENTS, THAT CONSTITUTES A SMOKING GUN BECAUSE IT CANNOT BE EXPLAINED BY THE OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORY. If the discussion does wander off in the shill's distracted direction without you or someone else doggedly bringing it back again and again, you lose. But if you continue to keep the discussion on track the inevitable conclusion by any impartial observer then has to be that 1) the official conspiracy theory cannot explain how this could be possible, and 2) thermite and/or other demolition materials COULD explain how puddles of molten iron and steel could have formed in the basements of all three World Trade Center buildings that collapsed to the ground in what looked remarkably like controlled demolitions - WTCs 1, 2, and 7. Remember WTC 7 was never even hit by an airplane and Larry Silverstein is on record as saying it was "pulled", demo slang for firing the explosives to bring a building down. Sorry got distracted, maybe I'll edit this post sometime but for the moment I am shooting first and asking questions later, meaning it can all be sorted out by topic but some things are important to get out before they're lost. But let me return to the original topic. It was supposed to focus on the unusual behaviors of certain people who seem to devote very large amounts of time "debunking" the search for 9/11 truth, which usually takes the form of a very aggressively bullying type of individual indulging in a lot of name-calling and ad hominem arguments. They are usually quickly identifiable as right-wingers by their intolerant views and demeaning attitude toward all others. They are quick to verbally attack with nothing more than some fantasy they've made up in their heads, and frequently they turn sexual. Usually when they do (this is the funniest part of their personalities IMO) their fantasies go homosexual, coming completely out of their own filthy minds and not anyone else's 99% of the time. I think it is very likely that a common origin of their homosexual fantasies also explains why, when a conservative is caught in a sex scandal, it is more likely than not to be a homo sex scandal. It's sweet irony since right-wingers so loudly and arrogantly condemn homosexuality so much, but it's also telling in the way they like to use it so freely in their ad hominems. They're practically obsessed a lot of the time. You'd almost think they were getting off sometimes they get so graphic, it's almost funny to observe if you can handle the abuse. Unfortunately some people can't and become offended and just leave or never dare participate (probably a large part of the reason for the shills' bullying in the first place), but people shouldn't shy away from such bullies, it only encourages them. Instead if you confront them with reason and logic and only acknowledge their ad hominems as recognizing what they are ("there you go with your right-wing name-calling again, is that the best you can do to muster an argument for your position?"). Never let it affect you, realize it is just a stranger's pathology going on, it isn't about you at all but about the kind of sick mind who would actually conceive in his mind much less put down in text those things -- which is also the kind of sick mind that would also work to cover up mass murder. The best thing is to just point it out calmly how barbarity does not substitute for reason, again and again until they get tired of having it pointed out to them. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes it is helpful when they are especially arrogantly profane is to ask them what Jesus would think of their words and opinions, since right-wingers for some reason usually consider themselves Christian (which they are only in name, they shame Jesus Christ's message and purpose). In a way you have to outbully the bully, but with harsh logic and reason instead of only harsh words. You are always far better verbally armed than an opponent if you have logic and reason on your side, as we do here.
Loud arrogant lying right-wingers are infesting public forums everywhere. What motivates them? Who can they be, to be so absolutely sure that all the evidence isn't evidence after all? Why are they always repeating the same things over and over acting as if they never heard the first ten dozen responses? Why are they investing so much time, SO MUCH TIME, don't they have another job or ever something else to do? Or ARE they doing their job? Why are they always trying to deny the obvious and sidetrack discussions away into meaninglessness? I would like to know the answers to these kinds of questions, and many more.
Some shills even go so far as to MAKE THEIR OWN "DEBUNKING" VIDEOS, as if they have nothing else to do! See 911NeverForget's videos
on YouTube for an example of the kind of completely deceptive and lying work they do.
It seems unlikely that an otherwise good and normal person would practically devote their life to something that they claim is baloney. I know I would never spend a great deal of time conerned about something I didn't believe in unless I had some kind of stake in the outcome somehow. I cannot believe that any sane person would do otherwise, which leads me to these conclusions:
NO SANE PERSON WOULD BEHAVE THE WAY THEY DO WITHOUT A GOOD REASON
A GOOD REASON IMPLIES AN UNSTATED AGENDA (See Wikipedia: shill definition
IT'S ONLY NECESSARY TO REALIZE SOME SHILLS WILL BE IN PUBLIC PLACES ON THE WEB.
EVIDENTLY THE 9/11 COVERUP IS STILL BEING MAINTAINED, SHILLS ARE EVIDENCE OF IT
THERE ARE CLEARLY LYING SHILLS WORKING TO MAINTAIN THE COVERUP FOR THE REAL 9/11 MASS MURDERERS. WHEN THEY KNOW THE TRUTH, THEY KNOW THE EVIDENCE, AND THEY JUST KEEP DENYING THE TRUTH AND PRETENDING THEY HAVEN'T SEEN ANY EVIDENCE, THEY ARE DELIBERATELY LYING
Once it becomes clear that for certain people who behave as if it is their career to spend all their time "debunking" 9/11 the point eventually comes when you have to consider that they may well be paid or personally involved agents of the coverup. If that is true (even just once) then that opens the possibility they can be tracked back to the real 9/11 killers. Law enforcement is able to track everyone on the Web these days through server logs and the NSA spy database too so as soon as someone with a conscience cracks or a serious investigation is begun, they should be able to track down all the 9/11 accomplices to mass murder presently working coverup detail.
Some shills may simply be right-wing zealots working on their own, religious or otherwise, thinking they're protecting Bush and Cheney by denying the truth and evidence pointing to 9/11 being an inside job: volunteer shills rather than paid shills. They may be able to slip the legal noose if no evidence can be found that they are paid, but they will know the social punishment of willfull collaboration when the truth is finally known.